It comes as no surprise that ad fraud has grown into an increasingly huge problem for brands and the digital advertising industry as a whole. This year alone, it is estimated that fraudsters will steal $5.8b from advertisers in a variety of different schemes that, despite the industry’s best defensive efforts, still manage to slip past the technology specifically designed to circumvent these growing issues.
As platforms such as audio and CTV/OTT become more and more in-demand for advertisers, the amount of fraudulent of illegitimate inventory is expanding in tandem, creating a seemingly defeated situation for strategies aimed at diminishing each of these loopholes.
It’s a veritable high-stakes game of Whac-a-Mole, with brands feeding billions of dollars into the coin slot in an attempt to keep up with both the latest developments in advertising technology, in addition to the defense techniques needed to combat the fraud developing in those growing verticals. However, trying to keep up with these changes without the proper resources or direction, can be like swimming against the current.
The problem of ad fraud is a fusion of two primary forces:
Although it may feel like a foregone conclusion—that paying for fraudulent ads is just part of the cost of doing business in today’s digital landscape—there are several ways in which brands can cut down on fraudulent ad spend and make sure they are getting access to the real, human audiences they need for their campaigns to truly succeed. Here are a few examples:
By working with PMPs instead of open exchanges, advertisers can know exactly which publications their ads will be placed in, which provides a greater level of confidence that the inventory is actually legitimate. Because PMPs are invite-only, the publishers themselves are carefully screening advertisers, so it is clear they take the legitimacy of their inventory very seriously through these transparent practices.
The Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) has created the ads.txt standard as a way to prevent unauthorized inventory sales. Publishers include this text file on their web servers, listing all of the companies that are authorized to sell their inventory, while on the other side, programmatic platforms will list the publishers whose inventory they are authorized to sell.
This allows buyers to check the validity of the inventory they purchase in order to ensure that it is legitimate. While the requirement of ads.txt has yet to be enforced, choosing publishers and demand-side platforms (DSPs) that comply with ads.txt can significantly reduce the likelihood of fraud.
Pre-bid targeting or segmentation allows buyers to purchase inventory on exchanges based on specific segments, including viewability, brand safety, suspicious activity, content categories, anti-fraud, as well as many other parameters. These filter out any known or potential fraud, essentially allowing buyers to bid on “clean” inventory.
Post-bid reporting works on the other end of the transaction, showing buyers where ads have run so any adjustments can be made if any placements were inappropriate. Organizations such as MOAT, IAS, and DoubleVerify offer these options, and leveraging these tactics can help to reduce fraudulent spend while optimizing and improving legitimate ad placement along the way.
While the landscape will always continue to evolve, and the problem of fraud will not entirely go away anytime soon (if ever), it is important for brands to make reasonable and proactive efforts to avoid ad fraud in order to protect their budgets as well as their reputations in the digital advertising space.
The big vendors like IAS, DoubleVerify, and MOAT have made some great strides in the fight against fraud each year, and even the major DSPs have played a pivotal role in combating digital ad fraud by cutting fraudulent sources, even at the expense of their bottom line. But the reality is, there will always be individuals whose mission it is to stay one step ahead of emerging technology in order to find loopholes and then use those gaps in the system to exploit it.
Partnering with verification vendors and digital marketing platforms that make fighting fraud a main priority can give brands an advantage in reducing their exposure and vulnerability to fraud. Choosing a vendor that focuses on transparency is critical, and asking them to provide the metrics to validate those efforts is a reasonable and responsible request through such a partnership.
By leveraging premium partners and inventory sources who specialize in combatting fraud, some platforms have seen their involuntary traffic (IVT) drop by 60% and maintain an average of less than 2% IVT. Working with vendors who are willing to show you the fruits of their efforts can give you the confidence to expand your digital ad plan and strategically increase your spend, knowing that those dollars will go towards attracting a real, human audience to your business.
By Expert commentator
This is a post we've invited from a digital marketing specialist who has agreed to share their expertise, opinions and case studies. Their details are given at the end of the article.
Turbocharge your results with this toolkit containing 7 resources
The Marketing Campaign Planning toolkit contains:
Start your Digital Marketing Plan today with our Free membership.
Recommended Blog Posts
Audit your digital media effectiveness to build stronger campaigns and an efficient marketing funnel Reviewing your use of digital media is a crucial starting point for creating or optimizing your digital marketing strategy. But how do you tune in and …..
Are you practicing always-on marketing, and if not, why not? In the pre-digital era, marketing activities were planned in campaign ‘bursts’ around new product launches and promotions. My belief is that to be effective, digital marketing needs a change in …..
Use our updated digital marketing tools infographic to audit the types of marketing technology you use As marketers today, we’re fortunate to have a huge number of free and low-cost digital marketing tools to give us insight into our customers, …..
