Find clickthrough rates for SEO – 8 reasons to use the new Google WMT feature

Update to keyword ranking tool May 2010

Google has now updated this tool for showing keyword positions in response to user feedback renaming it the “Search Query” tool. The main changes are:

  • Average position now shown to avoid need for drilldown
  • You can “Star” the target keyphrases most relevant to you to monitor on a separate tab

Original post

Wow, this is amazingly useful for reviewing the effectiveness of your SEO AND your marketing messages within the Google SERPs.

On April 14 Google has introduced a new facility within Google Webmaster Tools to help search marketers review click through rates within the natural search listings.

Here is an example for a “brand search” on my name:

So if you, or your agency aren’t signed up to Google Webmaster Tools, then is a good reason to get started.

Implications of new SEO Clickthrough data

For me, the most obvious applications of this are that you can use this new tool to:

1. Track your rankings for target terms – the position in search results is clearly displayed.

2. Show whether you have the best landing pages for your SEO – above you can see it’s the “About” page which I deliberately included for mis-spellings of my name. Of course Google Analytics and others will show you this better  since you will see the bounce rates.

3. Review clickthrough rates for different terms which helps you..

4. Review the effectiveness of your copy in encouraging clickthrough from the SERPs. If it’s below average for a position, then you know you have a problem.

5. Compare clickthrough rates for natural terms compared to different paid search / Adwords terms to help determine the relative effectiveness of copy and terms.

6. Review overall SEO effectiveness from the headline figures of impressions (how many you could reach) against clickthrough – how many you are attracting to your site.

7. Review marketing campaign effectiveness – how does variation occur through time

8. Review seasonal demand variations for products/services. This will work best for brand/navigational searches where you are likely to be top.

What do you think – how else could you use it?

What you can’t do?

For some other information you will have to turn to other data sources / analytics sources and maybe export this information to integrate. For example, this SEO clickthrough data doesn’t show you:

  • Bounce rates?
  • Value of visitors – how many convert on site and how much do they spend?
  • Review competitor data – Google may be introducing this tool to reduce the need for SEO rank checking software, but marketers will still use it for this purpose.
This entry was posted in SEO analytics. Bookmark the permalink.
  • Pingback: Search marketing essentials > Smart Insights Digital Marketing

  • Dave Chaffey

    And a 9th feature – check your performance in different markets, e.g. UK vs US for your most important keyphrases if operating internationally.

  • Pingback: Digital marketing software tools update > Smart Insights Digital Marketing

  • http://getinnepal.com Get In Nepal

    Nice Post! We always fine something new and informative from google webmaster tools. Also the crawler errors and stats.

  • Dave Chaffey

    It’s worth checking out the post by Carla Marshall on Dave Naylor’s blog which raises issues about the accuracy of this data and has a more real-world example than mine of a generic product keyphrase.

    My take is that you would expect and have to live with inconsistency since the Google Analytics depends on the position of the tracking tags on the page and the GWT data is recorded via the Google Search interface (and it won’t work accurately when searchers use the toolbar?).

    Still, it would be good if these data sources were integrated.

  • Pingback: Digital marketing strategy essentials > Smart Insights Digital Marketing

  • http://www.henry-phillips.com Henry Phillips

    I’m not sure if I’m imagining it, but this new tool appears to be restricted to the past month of data – I’m sure I could get data from March 11 yesterday, and today the earliest date available is March 12. If this is the case, then it’s a great shame – I was hoping to get more intelligence over time about the longer tail queries where the stats are currently below the reporting threshold (ie “<10").
    If this is the case, I hope that Google reconsiders, as otherwise this looks like an excellent tool.

    • Dave Chaffey

      Thanks Henry – I think you’re right – but checking the original GWT blog post it implies you will be able to get historical data, so hopefully this will roll-out.

Feedback Form
Feedback Form